APPLICATION OF VARIABLE CRITERION THEORY TO CHOISE REACTION TIME.GRICE GR; NULLMEYER R; SPIKER VA et al.1977; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 22; NO 5; PP. 431-449; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

A REVIEW OF THEORY AND RESEARCH ON MILLER'S RESPONSE COMPETITION (CONFLICT) MODELS.HEILIZER F.1977; J. GEN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 97; NO 2; PP. 227-280; BIBL. 8 P. 1/2Article

VISUAL PREPOTENCY AND EYE ORIENTATION.COLAVITA FB; TOMKO R; WEISBERG D et al.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 8; NO 1; PP. 25-26; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

HABIT REVERSAL VS NEGATIVE PRACTICE TREATMENT OF SELF-DESTRUCTIVE ORAL HABITS (BITING, CHEWING OR LICKING OF THE LIPS, CHEEKS, TONGUE OR PALATE)AZRIN NH; NUNN RG; FRANTZ RENSHAW SE et al.1982; J. BEHAV. THER. EXP. PSYCHIATRY; ISSN 0005-7916; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 49-54; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

COMPLEXITY, RESPONSE COMPETITION, AND PREFERENCE. IMPLICATIONS FOR AFFECTIVE CONSEQUENCES OF REPEATED EXPOSURE.HEYDUK RG; BAHRICK LE.1977; MOTIVAT. AND EMOT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 1; NO 3; PP. 249-259; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

THE STROOP PHENOMENON: PERCEPTUAL CONFLICT OR RESPONSE COMPETION.DOEHRMAN S; LANDAU R; O'CONNELL D et al.1978; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 47; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1127-1131; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

REWARD-INDUCED DECREASED PLAY EFFECTS: REATTRIBUTION OF MOTIVATION, COMPETING RESPONSES, OR AVOIDING FRUSTATION.PERRY DG; BUSSEY K; REDMAN J et al.1977; CHILD DEVELOP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 48; NO 4; PP. 1369-1374; BIBL. 1 P.Article

THE RESOLUTION OF APPROACH-AVOIDANCE CONFLICTYELEN DR.1979; J. RES. PERSONALITY; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 13; NO 3; PP. 326-350; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL POWER FUNCTIONS.STADDON JER.1978; PSYCHOL. REV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 85; NO 4; PP. 305-320; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE DEVELOPMENT OF WATER-INTAKE REGULATION DURING SCHEDULE-INDUCED POLYDIPSIAMAGYAR RL; WALDBILLIG RJ; MEYER ME et al.1980; PHYSIOL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0031-9384; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 25; NO 5; PP. 763-767; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

INTERACTIONS BETWEEN REINFORCED RESPONSES AND COLLATERAL RESPONSES.IVERSEN JH.1976; PSYCHOL. REC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 26; NO 3; PP. 399-413; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

A COMPARISON OF THE DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF STIMULUS COMPLEXITY AND RESPONSE COMPETITION ON SCHIZOPHRENICSHIRT M; GENSHAFT J.1980; BRIT. J. SOC. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 19; NO 2; PP. 167-171; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

STROOP INTERFERENCE. AN INPUT AND AN OUTPUT PHENOMENONSTIRLING N.1979; QUART. J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 31; NO 1; PP. 121-132; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

COMPETING RESPONSE DECREMENT AS A MEASURE OF ESCAPE LEARNING AND MEMORY IN YOUNG MICE: EFFECT OF LEARNED INHIBITION, MATURATION, OR AGE-DEPENDENT SHOCK SENSITIVITY.NAGY ZM; BURLEY JW; KIKSTADT LK et al.1977; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 10; NO 1; PP. 21-24; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

ELIMINATING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LEARNING DISABLED AND NONDISABLED CHILDREN ON A PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING TASKBRYANT ND; GETTINGER M.1981; J. EDUC. RES. (WASH.); ISSN 0022-0671; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 74; NO 5; PP. 342-346; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

RESPONSE COMPETITION AND INTERFERENCE EFFECTS IN PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING BY KORSAKOFF AMNESICSKINSBOURNE M; WINOCUR G.1980; NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA; ISSN 0028-3932; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 18; NO 4-5; PP. 541-548; ABS. FRE/GER; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

ASSESSMENT OF CHILDHOOD GENDER BEHAVIOR CHANGE.REKERS GA; WILLIS TJ; YATES CE et al.1977; J. CHILD PSYCHOL. PSYCHIATRY; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 18; NO 1; PP. 53-65; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

PERFORMANCE OF HUMANS IN CONCURRENT AVOIDANCE/POSITIVE-REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULESRUDDLE HV; BRADSHAW CM; SZABADI E et al.1982; J. EXP. ANAL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5002; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 38; NO 1; PP. 51-61; BIBL. 40 REF.Article

POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE TRANSFER OF CONTROL: INSTRUMENTAL RESPONSE MEDIATION AND RESPONSE COMPETITIONNAITOH S; STAATS AW.1980; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 15; NO 5; PP. 317-320; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

THE HIPPOCAMPUS AND CUE UTILIZATIONWINOCUR G.1980; PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0090-5046; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 8; NO 2; PP. 280-288; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo taskSMITH, Janette L; SMITH, Elizabeth A; PROVOST, Alexander L et al.International journal of psychophysiology. 2010, Vol 75, Num 3, pp 217-226, issn 0167-8760, 10 p.Article

RESPONSE COMPETITION EFFECTS IN SAME-DIFFERENT JUDGMENTSERIKSEN CW; O'HARA WP; ERIKSEN B et al.1982; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 32; NO 3; PP. 261-270; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

TIME COURSE ANALYSIS OF THE STROOP PHENOMENONGLASER MO; GLASER WR.1982; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; ISSN 0096-1523; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 8; NO 6; PP. 875-894; BIBL. 2 P.Article

Influence of category identity on letter matching: Conceptual penetration of visual processing or response competition?JING CHEN; PROCTOR, Robert W.Attention, perception & psychophysics. 2012, Vol 74, Num 4, pp 716-729, issn 1943-3921, 14 p.Article

Dilution: A Theoretical Burden or Just Load? A Reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010)LAVIE, Nilli; TORRALBO, Ana.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance. 2010, Vol 36, Num 6, pp 1657-1664, issn 0096-1523, 8 p.Article